|
Heather Cantino, IPM Home Page Strategies for safe home pest control Three steps to safer pest control: Intro for Teachers
|
The Southeast Ohio School IPM Project is providing guidance to southeast Ohio school districts to encourage adoption of integrated pest management (IPM). Funded by the Ohio Environmental Education Fund, the project runs September 1998 to May 2001. What is IPM? Integrated pest management (IPM) is an environmentally sensitive method of pest control that provides a safer, more effective alternative to pesticide spraying. IPM uses knowledge of pest biology to integrate least toxic controls that deny pests access to food, water, and shelter. IPM creates a school environment that is unfriendly to pests through regular maintenance, sanitation, and inspections-to find and correct conditions that encourage pests before pests become a problem. Chemicals (in the form of baits) are used only if non-chemical methods are inadequate. Baits (of chemicals that don't get into the air) are placed only where pests are a problem and where pests will find the baits, but children, pets, and other non-target organisms will not. IPM is important: School IPM reduces pesticide use indoors where children spend many hours and where pesticides persist and concentrate. Two weeks after spraying chlorpyrifos in Dursban, commonly used in schools, high levels were found on plastics and fabrics that had not been in the room during spraying.' Children face the greatest risks from pesticides for many physiological reasons; as pesticide use has increased, so have leukemia, brain tumors, and other childhood cancers linked to pesticide use." IPM is effective: Even without improved sanitation, a combination of baits and pheromone traps (which use insect communication chemicals as an attractant) has been found to be more effective than spraying, even in severe cockroach infestations.''' And because IPM addresses the causes of pest problems, it can permanently reduce or eliminate problems. IPM is economical: The focus on solving problems results in long-term cost savings. Initial expenditures on improved maintenance, sanitation, and monitoring are typically more than offset by reductions in pesticide use and by reduced incidence of problems. IPM is endorsed: USEPA, National Education Association, American Public Health Association, National PTA, and many states advocate school IPM. IPM is mandated for public schools in West Virginia, Texas, Maryland, Michigan, and New Jersey. Project accomplishments to date:
Maintenance staff, teachers, and students can help IPM succeed by reporting or correcting problems such as:
Curricular Connections: IPM provides opportunities for interdisciplinary, hands-on learning and students' participation in the safe maintenance of their school community.
Resources: BIRC. 1997. IPM for schools: A how-to manual. P0 Box 7414, Berkeley, CA 94707. Ph: 510-524-2567. Also publishes IPM practitioner and Common-sense pest control quarterly journals. Visit the BIRC website or write: birc@igc.org Olkowski, W. et al. 1991. Common-sense pest control. Newtown,
CT: Taunton Press. US EPA. 1993. Pest control in the school environment: Adopting integrated pest management. Publ. #735-F-93-012. National Center for Environmental Publications (free, ph: 800-490-9198). Washington State Department of Ecology. 1999. Calculating the true costs of pest control. Publication #99-433 (free, ph: 360-407-6700).
Web sites: |
|
| Three steps to safer pest control:Introfor Teachers | Teacher education poster | School kitchen poster | © 2000 Rural Action Inc. All rights reserved.
|